twitter
rss
Tampilkan postingan dengan label the threat of war. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label the threat of war. Tampilkan semua postingan

Behind the attack on iran, oil prices, the threat of war, and the knowledge of nuclear war.

Part 4: Result my opinion


        Iran is a country led by a great president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.Iran is islamic state in the middle east region. When the other middle eastern countries are Trying to shut the eye of a series of events Carried out by Israel and other Zionist, iran is a country That dared to oppose them. Why Iran can do this? 
Lets check this out from multiple sources ^ _ ^.

          Iran’s nuclear program is one of the most polarizing issues in one of the world’s most volatile regions. While American and European officials believe Tehran is planning to build nuclear weapons, Iran’s leadership says that its goal in developing a nuclear program is to generate electricity without dipping into the oil supply it prefers to sell abroad, and to provide fuel for medical reactors.

Most of the "world" know that nuclear development is prohibited unless conducted by the U.S. and Israel. Maybe some already know that They are the holder of the world today.

A lot of work done by the Zionist state to develop nuclear deter conducted by Iran, one of them by the oil embargo to the United States. With the hope of thwarting all threats of nuclear proliferation by Iran.

          As a result of the embargo, starting with the rise in world oil prices. And Indonesia have an indirect effect of the war. As I know that the State of Iran and east amid a global oil producer. With the oil embargo caused suppky bernbagai State to increase, one of Indonesia. Actual nuclear development is the development of science, for real. In the presence of nuclear development, will advance human knowledge. Starting from the source of energy to food technology.
However, any bias to be a nuclear threat when it used the wrong way. While the oil embargo by the United American is a great way to challenge indirectly the development of science. cause had been united merupaka iran science center and began to try to change it, then there is a variety of wars, threats by the United States.




Label: , , , ,
0 komentar |

Behind the attack on iran, oil prices, the threat of war, and the knowledge of nuclear war.


Part 3:  tensions increased over Iran’s nuclear program

A Scientist’s Death Deepens Fury at Israel and the U.S.

The head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, a top nuclear scientist who narrowly avoided an assassination attempt less than two years ago, has been given a new post as the commander for nuclear and radioactive emergencies, the Iranian military announced Tuesday
Dr. Abbasi is well known among United Nations nuclear experts, who consider him a major figure in Iran’s nuclear program, which the Iranians have insisted is peaceful but which Western nations suspect is a cover for possible weapons development. He is on a Security Council blacklist under sanctions that have penalized Iran for refusing to halt all uranium enrichment.
He is perhaps best known for having escaped death on Nov. 29, 2010, by a motorcycle assassin in Tehran who slapped a magnetized bomb on his vehicle. Dr. Abbasi was wounded; another top Iranian nuclear scientist was assassinated in an identical Tehran bomb attack the same day. Iranian leaders said the double bombing was an act of terrorism carried out by agents of Israel, which considers Iran its most dangerous enemy and has made no secret of its desire to subvert Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
The Iranian military’s announcement that Dr. Abbasi had been given a new title, commander of the Crisis Management Center for Nuclear and Radiation Accidents, was reported by Iran’s semi-official Fars News Agency. It was not clear from the announcement why Dr. Abbasi had been chosen for the new responsibility or whether it means he will relinquish his existing position.
On Jan. 11, as tensions increased over Iran’s nuclear program and belligerence toward the West mounted, Iran reported that an Iranian nuclear scientist died in what was termed a “terrorist bomb blast” in northern Tehran when an unidentified motorcyclist attached a magnetic explosive device to the scientist’s car. It was the fourth such attack reported in two years and, as after the previous incidents, Iranian officials indicated that they believed the United States and Israel were responsible.

The next day, Iran expressed deepening fury at Israel and the United States over the scientist’s death, and signaled that its Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps might carry out revenge assassinations.

News of the killing dominated Iran’s state-run news media, which were filled with vitriolic denunciations both of Israel, seen in Iran as the main suspect in his death, and the United States, where top officials have gone out of their way to issue strongly worded denials of responsibility.

Israeli officials, who regard Iran as their country’s main enemy, have not categorically denied any role in the killing, which came against a backdrop of growing pressure on Iran over its disputed nuclear program.

Label: , , , ,
0 komentar |

Behind the attack on iran, oil prices, the threat of war, and the knowledge of nuclear war.


Part 3 : Speculation Rises About an Israeli Attack

Iran has defended its nuclear program as peaceful and has defiantly pursued uranium enrichment through years of international pressure and sanctions. Israel’s increasingly urgent warnings on the need to halt Iran’s nuclear progress, before it gets much closer to being able to build a bomb, have prompted concerns that Israel might unilaterally mount a military strike — and have added to the implacable enmity between the two.
Speculation that Israel might attack Iran has intensified in recent months as tensions between the countries have escalated.

Tensions flared in February when Israeli officials blamed Iran in two separate attacks. On Feb. 13, Israeli Embassy personnel were targeted by bombers in the capitals of Georgia and India, injuring four people, including an Israeli diplomat’s wife. The embassy blasts used methods that were similar to attacks on Iranian nuclear scientists in recent years, for which Iran has blamed Israel. The next day, a series of explosions rocked a residential neighborhood in Bangkok, wounding several people. Thai authorities found a cache of bombs in a rented house and captured two men who carried Iranian passports. Evidence was accumulating that the bombings were part of a single plot, for which Israel has blamed Iran. Iranian officials have denied any involvement.


Should Israel decide to launch a strike on Iran, its pilots would have to fly more than 1,000 miles across unfriendly airspace, refuel in the air en route, fight off Iran’s air defenses, attack multiple underground sites simultaneously — and use at least 100 planes.

That was the assessment of American defense officials and military analysts close to the Pentagon, who said that an Israeli attack meant to set back Iran’s nuclear program would be a huge and highly complex operation. They described it as far different from Israel’s “surgical” strikes on a nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007 and Iraq’s Osirak reactor in 1981.

In a sign of rising American concern, Tom Donilon, the national security adviser, met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel in Jerusalem on Feb. 19, and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey warned on CNN that an Israeli strike on Iran right now would be “destabilizing.” Similarly, the British foreign secretary, William Hague, told the BBC that attacking Iran would not be “the wise thing” for Israel to do “at this moment.”
In November 2011, Israeli officials would not confirm or deny multiple reports in the Israeli news media that Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuwere pressing for a decision on whether to strike a uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, the centerpiece of Iran’s known nuclear-fuel production, and related sites across the country.

But in January 2012, seeking to lower the tone of nervous discourse as the United States and European Union imposed sanctions on Iran, Mr. Barak said that any decision to attack Iran because of its nuclear program was “very far off.”

Label: , , , ,
0 komentar |

Behind the attack on iran, oil prices, the threat of war, and the knowledge of nuclear war.

Part 2: Oil Embargo in iran


In an effort to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, the United States and the European Union took significant steps to cut Iran off from the international financial system, announcing coordinated sanctions aimed at its central bank and commercial banks. In addition, the United States also imposed sanctions on companies involved in Iran’s nuclear industry, as well as on its petrochemical and oil industries, adding to existing measures that seek to weaken the Iranian government by depriving it of its ability to refine gasoline or invest in its petroleum industry.

In retaliation for the sanctions, Iran vowed to block the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil transit point. Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the United States would “take action and reopen the strait,” which could be accomplished only by military means, including minesweepers, warship escorts and potentially airstrikes.

By February 2012, the sanctions imposed by the West appeared to be taking a toll. Iran’s economy was showing further signs of strain, with the government looking for ways to avoid the use of dollars in international oil trade, new reports of problems importing food, and a Gallup poll suggesting a majority of Iranians were worried about financial pain from the penalties already imposed. In addition, a flurry of aggressive gestures — attacks on Israelis attributed to Iran; President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s renewed posturing over Iran’s latest nuclear advance; and the threats of cutting off oil sales from six European countries — suggested that Iranian leaders were responding frantically,
 and with increasing unpredictability, to the sanctions.

On Feb. 19, Iran’s government ordered a halt of oil exports to Britain and France, in what may be only an initial response to the European Union’s decision to cut off Iranian oil imports and freeze central bank assets beginning in July. However, Britain and Francedepend little on Iranian oil, so their targeting may be a mostly symbolic act, a function of the strong positions the two nations have taken in trying to halt Iranian nuclear enrichment. Also, the government signaled that it might expand the ban on oil shipments to other members of the 27-nation European Union.

As a result of the embargo, starting with the rise in world oil prices. And Indonesia have an indirect effect of the war. As I know that the State of Iran and east amid a global oil producer. With the oil embargo caused suppky bernbagai State to increase, one of Indonesia. Actual nuclear development is the development of science, for real. In the presence of nuclear development, will advance human knowledge. Starting from the source of energy to food technology. 

Label: , , , ,
0 komentar |

Behind the attack on iran, oil prices, the threat of war, and the knowledge of nuclear war.



Part 1: Nuclear Program

Iran is a country led by a great president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.Iran is islamic state in the middle east region. When the other middle eastern countries are Trying to shut the eye of a series of events Carried out by Israel and other Zionist, iran is a country That dared to oppose them. Why Iran can do this? 
Lets check this out from multiple sources ^ _ ^.
there has been much speculation on the cause of the attack iran, on the one hand there is the support of the attack, and on the other handsome are against such attacks. From some sources say that the origin of the attacks committed by Israel is because Iran began developing nuclear weapons.
Most of the "world"  know that nuclear development is prohibited unless conducted by the U.S. and Israel. Maybe some already know that they are the holder of the world today.

Iran’s nuclear program is one of the most polarizing issues in one of the world’s most volatile regions. While American and European officials believe Tehran is planning to build nuclear weapons, Iran’s leadership says that its goal in developing a nuclear program is to generate electricity without dipping into the oil supply it prefers to sell abroad, and to provide fuel for medical reactors.
Iran and the West have been at odds over its nuclear program for years. But the dispute has picked up steam since November 2011, with new findings by international inspectors, tougher sanctions by the United States and Europe, threats by Iran to shut the Strait of Hormuz to oil shipments and Israel signaled increasing readiness to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Fears of an attack on Iran have driven up oil prices and represent a threat to  the already fragile state of a global economy still reeling from a sovereign debt crisis in Europe. At the same time, the Iranians have acutely felt the squeeze from a round of  sanctions aimed at getting Iran to freeze  its uranium enrichment program.
In March 2012, the global powers dealing with the program announced that they had accepted an Iranian offer to resume negotiations that broke off in stalemate more than a year before. Talks were set to begin in Turkey in mid-April, with both sides jostling for advantage in the days running up to the negotiations.
American and European diplomats said that one demand from the Obama administration and its allies would be a halt in the production of uranium fuel that is considered just a few steps from bomb grade, and a stop to the shipment of existing stockpiles of that fuel out of the country.


A Nuclear ‘Trigger’
Starting in early 2008, the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency repeatedly accused Iran of dragging its feet in addressing “possible military dimensions” of its nuclear program. Tehran has declared that all of the evidence gathered by the agency — mostly from the intelligence agencies of member countries, and some from its own inspectors — are fabrications.
An I.A.E.A. report issued in February 2011 listed seven outstanding questions about work Iran apparently conducted on warhead design. The documents in the hands of the agency raise questions about work on how to turn uranium into bomb fuel, how to cast conventional explosives in a shape that can trigger a nuclear blast, how to make detonators, generate neutrons to spur a chain reaction, measure detonation waves and make nose-cones for missiles.
The May report gave new details for all seven of the categories of allegations. The disclosure about the atomic trigger centered on a rare material — uranium deuteride, a form of the element made with deuterium, or heavy hydrogen. Nuclear experts say China and Pakistan appear to have used the material as a kind of atomic sparkplug.
The report said it had asked Iran about evidence of “experiments involving the explosive compression of uranium deuteride to produce a short burst of neutrons” — the speeding particles that split atoms in two in a surge of nuclear energy. In a bomb, an initial burst of neutrons is needed to help initiate a rapid chain reaction.
Harold M. Agnew, a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory, said the compression of uranium deuteride suggested work on an atomic trigger.
The agency’s disclosure about Iran’s alleged use of uranium deuteride also suggests another possible connection between Tehran’s program and Abdul Qadeer Khan, the rogue Pakistani engineer who sold nuclear information.
A famous photograph of Dr. Khan, whom Pakistan has released from house arrest in Islamabad, shows him in front of the schematic diagram of an atom bomb on a blackboard. A pointer to the bomb’s center is labeled uranium deuteride.
The May report also gave fresh charges on the design of missile warheads. Documentary evidence, it said, suggested that Iran had conducted “studies involving the removal of the conventional high explosive payload from the warhead of the Shahab-3 missile and replace it with a spherical nuclear payload.”
The Shahab-3 is one of Iran’s deadliest weapons, standing 56 feet tall. In parades, Iran has draped them with banners reading, “Wipe Israel off the map.”

Iran’s Nuclear History
Iran’s first nuclear program began in the 1960s under the shah. It made little progress, and was abandoned after the 1979 revolution, which brought to power the hard-line Islamic regime. In the mid-1990s, a new effort began, raising suspicions in Washington and elsewhere. Iran insisted that it was living up to its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but in 2002, an exile group obtained documents revealing a clandestine program. Faced with the likelihood of international sanctions, the government of Mohammad Khatami agreed in 2003 to suspend work on uranium enrichment and allow a stepped-up level of inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency while continuing negotiations with Britain, France and Germany.
In August 2005, Mr. Khatami, a relative moderate, was succeeded as president by Mr. Ahmadinejad, a hard-line conservative. The following January, Iran announced that it would resume enrichment work, leading the three European nations to break off their long-running talks. Under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has the right to enrich uranium, but the atomic energy association called for the program to be halted until questions about the earlier, secret program were resolved.
          


Label: , , ,
0 komentar |
Langganan: Komentar (Atom)